honky tonk
← Back to blog |
← Back to main
by honky tonker •
2026-08-29 23:35:59
Why Honky Tonks Are, Like, Basically Marxist
Okay, so, listen. I have been thinking about this for a while, and I am pretty sure honky tonks are Marxist. Not, like, officially Marxist. Nobody is standing on a bar at 1:30 in the morning yelling about dialectical materialism. Although, honestly, give the guy two more beers and he probably will. What I mean is that the honky tonk, as an institution, contains within it the fundamental contradictions of capitalism. And also peanuts. There are usually peanuts.
First of all, you have the workers. Bartenders. Servers. Musicians. The guy whose entire job seems to be making sure you don't fall into the jukebox. These people are selling their labor, right? Their labor-power! That's Marx! You can't escape Marx in a honky tonk because Marx is sitting there with you, except Marx has a cowboy hat on now and he's asking if you've seen his cigarettes.
And then there's the boss. The owner. The bourgeoisie, baby. He owns the means of production, which in this case are, like, the bar, the taps, the speakers, and probably the really sticky floor. The workers don't own any of that. They show up, work their shift, and get paid while the owner extracts surplus value. Except sometimes the surplus value is in the form of tips, which is somehow even more complicated because now everybody is angry and pretending not to be angry about the tip jar.
But here's where it gets REALLY Marxist.
The honky tonk brings together people from completely different classes and makes them participate in the same social ritual. Rich guy? Poor guy? Oil executive? Mechanic? College student who has made a series of extremely questionable decisions? Doesn't matter. At the honky tonk, everyone is drinking the same cheap beer and listening to the same guy play "Friends in Low Places" for the fourth time.
That's class solidarity!
Or at least it could be class solidarity. More likely it's three-dollar domestic beer and poor decision-making. But the potential is there.
And the dancing! Ohhh, the dancing. You ever think about how two people who have never met can just get up and dance together because there's a song playing? That's the abolition of alienation, baby. For three minutes and seventeen seconds, you are no longer a worker selling your labor to some corporation. You are a person doing a little spinny thing with your boots.
Then the song ends and you remember you have work tomorrow.
Alienation returns.
Capitalism wins.
But not completely.
Because the honky tonk is also a place where commodities are transformed into experiences. The beer isn't just beer anymore. It's COMMUNITY. The cowboy boots aren't just boots. They're IDENTITY. The live music isn't just music. It's AUTHENTICITY, which is extremely important because capitalism has spent centuries taking everything authentic, putting a logo on it, and charging $87.
And yet the honky tonk keeps trying to escape this.
It says: No. We will dance. We will drink. We will sing songs about trains and heartbreak and losing your truck and maybe finding your truck again. We will make culture collectively, loudly, badly, and with very little concern for quarterly earnings.
That's the revolutionary spirit.
Probably.
Look, I am not saying Karl Marx would have loved honky tonks. I don't know if Karl Marx even liked country music. He probably would've been more into, like, German folk songs or whatever. But I am saying that if you dropped Marx into a honky tonk and gave him a whiskey, eventually he'd start pointing at the bartender and saying, "You see? The proletariat!"
And then the bartender would say, "Sir, you've had enough."
And Marx would say, "This is class oppression."
And honestly?
He'd have a point.
